About

The following is the short bio I wrote for Slice of SciFi (I am listed as a reporter, but mostly I write opinion pieces).

My interests are as eclectic as they are numerous. Racquetball, photography, reading, shooting, traveling, eating, and writing are activities I enjoy, all the while stressing a lack of expertise in any particular one.

A refugee of the auto industry, I now live in sunny Colorado. Currently making little use of my engineering degree, I often wonder what might have been had I listened to the English professor who, in 1976, strongly suggested I switch my major from Engineering to English. Showing a remarkable lack of foresight, I opted to continue on the path to becoming a pretty good, but uninspired, Mechanical Engineer. But for that one decision, I could today be a little known writer, working for little money, and struggling to get some recognition.

That’s a nice generic description, but I figure I should add a little more about me and this blog because, you know, so many people care.

The name.  Disperser came about from our trip to Yellowstone a few years ago.  The wolf pictured on the header walked not 20 feet from me, and at the time I was not sure it was a wolf because I was not aware they traveled alone.  I then came across this definition:

Disperser – A wolf that leaves the pack and strikes out on its own.  Some of these “lone wolves” have no social territory, and they live on the fringes of established packs or in the areas where several territories come together. Their single status may make them vulnerable to malnutrition and to attacks by other wolves.  

This sounded familiar to me . . . it should because it’s an accurate description of my place in society.  I chose it as my blog name both because of the description, and because the other meaning of Disperser is to spread widely, or disseminate, and that’s what my aim is with the blog.  I want to spread my views, opinions, observations, photographs I like, and the fiction I write.  Of course, the “widely” part is not entirely accurate; I count on one hand the people who read my stuff.  

Political views.  I would say I am in the middle, but I am not.  On some things I am to the right, on some things I am to the left.  And even that is not accurate.  

For instance, just because I hold the view I should be able to own and carry a gun does not mean I am in the camp of typical guns proponents.  It does mean I am not a fan of anti-gun activists.

Abortion and gay marriage are not issues affecting me, so I don’t have strong feeling about the subjects themselves.  I do have strong feelings regarding people seeking to curtail or deny others the freedom of personal choice, so those two topics peripherally fall inside the circle of things I care about.  

In general my political views have a libertarian slant.  I am of the strong belief government should play a minimal role in the lives of people, especially since the majority of politicians appear and act as if they have been corrupted by the power they hold, and seduced by the easy money (meaning: bribes) associated with catering to special interest groups and corporations.

I have no illusion about either of the major party serving my needs or interests, and the smaller parties are often bat-shit crazies organized around simplistic and unrealistic agendas.  I vote based on what I believe will be least harmful to things I am interested in.

Religious Views.  I do not believe in gods.  I do not believe in mystical forces.  I do not believe in a universal intelligence.  I hold no belief in anything which violates what we know about the real world.

I was born into a Catholic family.  Around the age of 8 I started to ask questions about stuff that even at that tender age contradicted what I knew about the world.  I was told I was too young to understand, and eventually I would understand.  Eventually I did, but not the way they thought.  By 14 I told my parents I did not want to go to mass, confession, or have communion.  I remember them not being happy (my uncle, recently deceased, was a priest all his life).   At the time I did not know about atheism, skepticism, and all them other isms.

Through my teens there were still times I wanted to believe in something, so beginning in my late teens and into my twenties I look into other religions, beliefs, etc.  I am kind when I say I found them lacking.  Back then I firmly believed people should educate themselves about their own religion and about competing religious views.  I believed if they did, they would soon realize the emperor indeed has no clothes.  I was naive.  People resist challenges to their beliefs, even becoming more entrenched as problems with their belief system are pointed out to them.

These days my concern goes back to that personal choice and freedom thing.  Unfortunately religion is at the base of nearly every attack on personal freedom.  So religion is my enemy.

I think people can believe, worship, and live to whatever cockamamie creation story, wacked-out god, and spiritual force they choose.  The moment they start to actively pursue a course aimed at having others conform to their self-determined rules, is the moment I raise my voice in opposition.

This, of course, is a simplistic summary.  Individual issues are a lot more complex than can be examined here, but in general if one person seeks to infringe on the rights of another based on religious beliefs, they are greatly diminished in my eyes.

And if a person refuses to constantly challenge what they believe in, I have little respect for them.  As one might imagine, I have few friends.

Life in general.  I am 58 years of age as I write this.  I am tired.  I want to live the remaining of my life trying for the most part to enjoy it.  Broadly speaking this means spending time with my wife and living in a constant state of amazement and wonder.

I am not blind to the problems of the world, the suffering of literally billions, and to the gathering darkness.  I give to charity, I help others, I keep up with what is happening, and cast my small voice hither and fro to join other voices in opposition of bad stuff, and support of good stuff.

But my personal commitment is slowly shifting to my own self and to my wife.  I don’t know how much longer we have.  Either or both of our lives could literally end tomorrow, and I aim to live what time I have left in a manner that will not cause me to have regrets later on, and so as to leave the small portion of the world I can influence better off for me having been here.  Or at least no worse off.

14 Responses to About

  1. …and perhaps wishing you had been an engineer.

  2. disperser says:

    I’ve never met anyone who wished they had been an engineer.

    Sure, they admire the traits . . . clarity of vision, flawless reasoning, kindness, ruthlessness, facility with weapons, writing flair, and subtle humor, but when it comes to actually working as an engineer . . . look how the engineer is portrayed in The Big Bang Theory.

  3. Hi there! I love following your blog. can’t seem to find an email address for you- so do you mind dropping me an email when you get a chance? I would love to have you guest blog on Bound for Adventure. Thanks!!

  4. 96arley says:

    I’ve enjoyed your about section and look forward to more of your commentary on your life. I fall in line with many of your opinions (aside from spirituality) and am certainly of the accord that we as people, regardless of race, religion, orientation, ethnic background, culture or political affiliation, have no right to impose our own beliefs and personal decisions upon another who’s actions do not impose upon our own rights. Thanks for visiting and commenting and keep up the fantastic work here!

  5. m5son (mike) says:

    I totally get you. Since we both live in Colorado, let me know when you want to go shooting.

    • disperser says:

      Who do you want to shoot?

      Seriously, where do you shoot? I’ve been waiting for a decent shooting range near me. People here go off on public lands and shoot, but I am a bit nervous about doing that since along with conscientious shooters there are always jackasses who are reckless.

      Mind you, I’m not nervous about being shot; I’m worried I won’t be able to control my urge to clean up the gene pool.

      Fort Carson is supposed to be adding a public shooting range, and I am looking forward to that.

      I live in Monument. Where’s do you live? (no addresses, please; just general area)

  6. I wanted to let you know that we nominated you for the Versatile Blogger award. Please follow this path to view our post
    http://throughmylens365.wordpress.com/2012/02/23/versatile-blogger/

    • disperser says:

      While I appreciate the sentiment behind the nomination, and acknowledge the sincerity of your opinion, I respectfully decline the nomination.

      Some time back I became aware of these nominations and wrote a post specifically related to these types of awards. The post is linked at the bottom of each of my subsequent blog posts with the intent of avoiding this particular occurrence.

      (http://disperser.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/blogger-awards-2/)

      Understand it is not my intention to minimize the recognition you received, for I have seen your work and can easily understand and concur with you being nominated (and I predict you will get more).

      But much like being Freshly Pressed, these awards are counter to my own peculiar way of looking at the world, and the way I want the world to interact with me.

      That said, first and foremost I sincerely hope you will not feel hurt by me declining your generous nomination, and second I hope you will not be resentful because of it.

      Thank you.

  7. disperser says:

    * * * * * S T O P * * * * * S T O P * * * * * S T O P * * * * * S T O P * * * * *
    Dear Visitor:
    If you are considering nominating me for any of the currently popular “Blogger Awards” (recognized by the requirement the winner nominates X-number of other bloggers), please refrain from doing so since I will decline the nomination. I appreciate your desire to recognize my work, but I would much prefer a personalized note from you to that effect. Thank You.

    http://disperser.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/blogger-awards-2/

    * * * * * S T O P * * * * * S T O P * * * * * S T O P * * * * * S T O P * * * * *

  8. seekraz says:

    Emilio – I just read your post about removing the “like” button and comment field from your posts…it’s interesting and I respect your opinion, fully, while having a different one. Personally, I often hit the like button simply as a means of telling you that I was there…seekraz came to visit. Yes, we write and post our photos for ourselves, as you say, but if they were truly for ourselves, they’d be in a journal on our computer or on our book shelf and not out here for the world to view. So…if we’re going to share it, shouldn’t we let people tell us they visited or liked whatever they saw? Shouldn’t we let them tell us what they think about it all? No, we don’t have to get stuck on or eager for their praise, but if we’re going to put it out here for the world, shouldn’t we allow some feedback more than clicking a stupid star on the top of the screen that doesn’t say who visited? We’ve spawned this community, seems like we should interact a bit if we’re going to be here. Anyway, those are my thoughts. I’ve enjoyed visiting with you, here and on my site. I’d like to be able to tell you that I stopped-by sometimes and even that I like what you’re throwing out here. I enjoy your biting wit…I further enjoy knowing that I’m in like-company in regard to your disbelief in gods and supernatural hogwash…don’t find too many people willing to say as much. Will see you around…. Scott

    • disperser says:

      Thanks for the thoughtful comment.

      First, I should say that anyone with a WordPress account can still hit “like” on all the posts. It’s up in the header when you are logged in (next to “follow” of “following”). There is no tally on the post, but I get an e-mail notice for each like. I found that out when I got a few likes after I switched the option off in the post.

      And I agree with your assessment of the incongruity between my statement about writing for myself, and having a public blog. Perhaps I should clarify a bit. I do want to make my opinion public, share my fiction, show off my pictures. That is something which gives me pleasure and purpose. I don’t want to force it on anyone, but everyone is free to peruse it, be it because they search it out, or chance upon it. It also forces a certain amount of discipline I might not have if it was strictly a private diary.

      And yes, I have struggled with the whole feedback thing. But let me point something out . . . you have posted photos of a number of murals on your blog. You can appreciate them, you share them with others, but you do not know who the artist is. You were happy to share them with others without interaction with the originator.

      Don’t get me wrong; I like feedback . . . but that feedback tells me things that sometime I don’t want to hear. It tells me few people ever click on any of the links. Fewer still go to the SmugMug albums associated with the posts. By few I mean I can count them on one hand . . . even if I was a press operator.

      Many times I get likes on my posts within the first few seconds of them having gone up. It takes me five to ten minutes to read some of my posts, and I am familiar with them. I don’t know what the people are liking.

      There is a conflict within me, you see. Those kinds of things affect me somewhat . . . I am willing to put in multiple hours on each post, and I can stand back, look at it, and say “Yes; that turned out well.” But it deflates me a bit when no one looks at even half the work I did. I lose some of the incentive to keep putting forth that kind of effort. In a way, I rather just know I had visitors (the daily view count), and not know if they just glanced at the stuff or actually sat down to digest it. Just like the murals, it’s enough to know someone’s gaze washed over them. But when I get comments saying how much people liked the posts, and then I don’t see the corresponding interaction, it makes me wonder what exactly they liked.

      Earlier in the year I had committed to daily posts. I thought I did a pretty good job, but it took both a lot of time, and sometime I had to rush stuff. According to conventional wisdom, to ramp up viewership, to get more hits, and to have lots of followers I should return to that model. But I prefer what I do.

      The problem with what I do is that sometime it can be daunting. Few people have the time to really read and immerse themselves in the kind of posts I write. You mention that occasionally you hit “like” just to let me know you were there. That sort of takes on the same taint that “friend” has in FaceBook. There is a dilution to the meaning of the word.

      I would be nice to have some other way, some other metric that said who came to visit. To that end, the subscription (or following) of a blog is a statement of approval. I know I am selective as to the blogs I follow, and I don’t follow everyone who follows me. In part it’s because there is no time to look at everything, but also because some blogs, while good, do not overlap my interests. I am happy to assume people who follow me find sufficient reason to do so. I don’t know for sure . . . maybe they just like to receive lots of e-mail notices.

      I’m writing a book here . . . probably because I am still unsure of my actions. I don’t want to cut people off, but I’ve not worked out a good way to shape the interaction. There’s the e-mail thing, but that is usually too personal (and time-consuming).

      I’ll see how this goes for a bit, and then maybe I will switch on the comments again.

      Thanks for the feedback.

  9. seekraz says:

    Hello again, Emilio –

    Thank you, too, for your thoughtful and complete response. I do appreciate the time you’ve taken to explain yourself…which you certainly didn’t have to do.

    I am aware of the “like” button up on the top frame of the WordPress screen…kind of impersonal, but I suppose it still serves a purpose…”someone” liked the post.

    I agree with the feedback being a positive reinforcer, encouraging us to be diligent in our writing or photography, whatever, whereas if we were doing it strictly for ourselves, we might not adhere to our discipline of posting regularly, etc. The feedback is very encouraging, makes us be more critical of what we’re putting out there. Good point.

    And with my posting pictures of murals without ever giving that feedback to the artists, another good point in context, but to clarify, especially on the more elaborate works, I have sought those artists on every occasion that I have gone to photograph the murals…there are often people in that alley-way and I have asked about the artists without fail, upon every visit. I haven’t left a card or anything for them to contact me, have not pursued them, but my posting of their work is a testimony of my appreciation for it. But still, point taken; I can appreciate your work without telling you that I do…but given the nature of our community here in this blog-realm, I would like to be able to tell you what I like about your work…and strangely, I would like for you to know that it was me hitting the “like” button…who knows why…maybe for a connection, I don’t know. Anyway…I understand your position on the matter.

    Regarding your comment about someone liking your post within seconds of you hitting the “publish” button when you know that it takes at least 10 minutes or more to actually read it, I agree…that does diminish the value of the “like” as feedback…actually makes it meaningless…which touches on my comment of hitting the “like” button to let you know I was there…which was an incomplete statement on my part…if I didn’t like the post, I wouldn’t have hit the “like” button to tell you I was there…I hit the “like” button to tell you that I was there, even though I’m not leaving a comment to tell you “what” I liked, which has more of the essence of real feedback.

    That’s probably enough on the topic. I enjoy reading your posts and noting the details of some of your photos…enjoy your world-view…and follow your blog. So whether I can tell you exactly what I like about each post, or even that it’s me “liking” the thing, I’ll be there reading.

    Thanks for listening/reading. Scott

  10. disperser says:

    * * * * * S T O P * * * * * S T O P * * * * * S T O P * * * * * S T O P * * * * *
    Dear Visitor:
    If you are considering nominating me for any “Blogger Awards” (recognized by the requirement the winner nominates X-number of other bloggers), please refrain from doing so since I will decline the nomination. I appreciate your desire to recognize my work, but I would much prefer a personalized note from you to that effect. Thank You.

    http://disperser.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/blogger-awards-2/

    * * * * * S T O P * * * * * S T O P * * * * * S T O P * * * * * S T O P * * * * *

Voice your opinion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s